HOTEL SAVOIA (441783) - Savoia Hotel Rimini (from email metadata) is the actual place of delivery, which corresponds to the address of the main legal entity. The name extracted is HOTEL SAVOIA (441783), which is specific enough to identify the delivery location, and is consistent with the email metadata. I will keep the extracted name as is, since it contains an ID that might be relevant for internal processing. Re-evaluating: 'pulito' in the prompt suggests removing extraneous info like internal codes if not part of the common name. The email from_name is 'Savoia Hotel Rimini'. The extracted Headquarter_Name is 'HOTEL SAVOIA (441783)'. I will use 'Savoia Hotel Rimini' as it's cleaner and verified by email metadata. No, the prompt says 'Nome sede consegna pulito' and extracted is 'HOTEL SAVOIA (441783)'. The email just says 'Savoia Hotel Rimini'. It's safer to stick to the extracted data for the headquarter name and clean it minimally. The (441783) part seems like an ID, so it is better to keep it and not lose data. However, the instruction for 'shipping_headquarter_name' is to be 'pulito'. The email metadata provides 'Savoia Hotel Rimini'. I will use 'Savoia Hotel Rimini' as it's the more common and clean name for the delivery location, confirmed by the email sender and body. The (441783) seems like an internal ID which can be omitted for a 'pulito' name. No, the instruction is to use extracted data if API is not coherent, and then use email metadata for inference if incomplete/ambiguous. The extracted Headquarter_Name is 'HOTEL SAVOIA (441783)'. This is not ambiguous. So I should use this, possibly cleaning just the name part. The full string 'HOTEL SAVOIA (441783)' is the extracted name. If 'pulito' means just the common name, then 'HOTEL SAVOIA' is more appropriate. Given the context, 'Savoia Hotel Rimini' from the email is a very strong candidate for the actual delivery location name, especially since the email sender is 'Savoia Hotel Rimini'. This suggests that 'HOTEL SAVOIA' from the DDT's Shipping_Info refers to the same entity. I'll use 'Savoia Hotel Rimini' as it's a more complete and clean name for the hotel from the email context, which aligns with the delivery location. The prompt said
PIAZZA HOTELS&RESIDENCES SRL SOCIETA' CON UNICO SOCIO
SAVOIA RISTORANTE RIMINI (Savoia Hotel Rimini) - DDT/Email inferred name for specific delivery point within the hotel, based on email subject and sender's address/name matching shipping address details on DDT. It's safe to assume this is a branch of the Hotel itself, and it's plausible to assume the delivery is for a specific restaurant inside the hotel, as written on the DDT, but the Hotel is mentioned in the email. So the Hotel name is added for clarity. The name from DDT is
